A construction lien is filed against your property claiming that a contractor (or even a subcontractor hired by your contractor) was not paid for labor, services, and/or materials rendered.
To shorten the one-year time period available to a lienor to commence an action to enforce any claim of lien (or claim against a bond/security), the owner or its attorney can record a Notice of Contest of Lien with the clerk’s office using a form provided in § 713.22(2). This notice provides the lienor with a 60-day notice to institute lien foreclosure proceedings. If the lienor fails to institute suit to enforce the lien within 60 days after being served with such Notice of Contest, the lien shall be extinguished automatically.
Transferring the lien to security, such as a cash or surety bond, removes the potential cloud that the lien places on the property’s title. However, once the lien is transferred to such security, the lienor’s claim for recourse is against the security/bond – not against the property.
If a lienor timely records a claim of lien and even files suit within the year to foreclose on such lien, the property owner may still invoke the remedies and transfer the lien to a bond/security and, by properly recording and serving the Notice of Contest, the owner can accelerate the time for the lienor to take action against the surety or face losing its interest in the value of the claimed improvement or enhancement to the property.
Accordingly, lienors should be mindful upon receipt of a notice of the transfer bond and notice of contest that they should act within 60 days to institute a suit or amend and join the surety to the existing suit, or possibly face losing their security interest.
Notably, this process only applies to a potential extinguishment of the lien and right to pursue the security. However, a failure to comply with these statutory mechanisms does not operate to preclude a contractor from proceeding with certain of its other claims against the owner, if applicable.
It is critical to consult with experienced construction attorneys, like our team at Haber Law, in order to assist owners effectuating the transfer within the statutory deadlines to protect their rights and limit contractor remedies, or, on the flip side, protect contractors from having their rights extinguished when such statutory mechanisms are being utilized.
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal’s revised opinion in Avila v. Biscayne 21 Condo.,…
The issue of whether a condominium association can restrict a unit owner’s attorney from attending…
Join Jonathan Goldstein, Marnie Dale Ragan, and Rebecca Casamayor on October 14th at 12PM for…
As the real estate market continues to attract investors from across the country, more parties…
Eleven Attorneys Earn National Recognition for Achievements in Condominium and HOA, Construction, Real Estate, and…
Join Jacob Epstein, Partner and Co-Chair of the Construction Law Group at Haber Law, for…